Now let’s test to see if my other images are still getting that color cast when processed and saved in DNG format. I cropped around 10% of the image away to give a slightly larger view of the moon. I shot this image with the Canon EOS R5 and my 100-500mm RF lens with the RF 2.0X Extender fitted for a focal length of 1000mm. I forfeited a little detail in the moon, but the noise destroyed most of the detail anyway, so I’m pretty happy with the result. I’ll have to put up with saving my images as TIFF files when the color cast does cause issues.Īnyway, first here is the photo that I shot of the Lunar Eclipse with Uranus (I said Neptune in the recording – sorry!) sitting diagonally down in the bottom left thirds intersection. This time though, even if I do see the issue again, I’m going to keep the software, as it’s so good. I was not yet convinced that they had solved their problems with saving as DNG files, though, so today, I’m going to share the Lunar Eclipse shot that I processed with Topaz Photo AI, and then we’ll move on to do a few more tests to see if the problem still exists. It looked pretty good, and I could not see any color casts, so I was happy with my purchase and somewhat relieved to have that Topaz magic back in my digital toolbox. You can’t save your images with the trial license, though, so I bought a license and saved my image as a DNG file. So a few nights ago, after shooting the very dark Lunar Eclipse at ISO 3200, leaving me with a fair bit of noise to clean up, I tried Topaz Photo AI, using a trial license, and was once again amazed at how well it dealt with the noise in my image. Since that review, though, I have, on several occasions, missed the pretty amazing noise reduction that the Topaz tools provided. 3. Powerful software if one starts the processing with a less thanĭecent shot.In April this year, I tried the Topaz Labs suite of tools and ended up requesting a refund because there were some nasty color casts in the DNG files that Topaz created after I processed some raw files from my Canon EOS cameras and viewed them in Capture One Pro. It can be easily resolved in my RAW converter so I see nothing to 2. The pixel noise has disappeared! At such magnification, though, Not suffered much considering the heavy enlargement. I see a clear, read spectacular, difference in the noise reductionĪpplied to the enlarged image and a sharpening that is relativelyĭecent but not at all in the details where the magnified original has the original was magnified in Preview to match the size of the processed fileĬONCLUSIONS 1.I opened both the severely cropped original and the enlarged file in Preview. ![]() fast processing - with the machine at my disposal.simple, trouble free installation on my Mac.I processed the image (in the trial version) enlarging it by 6x Of the full frame - allowing generous negative space around I processed the RAW, cropped it and the result is a jpg 1/12 I was at the marsh and shot a Gull (with the combo D850 +Ħ00mm ƒ4) that I would not normally shoot because too far. I was made curious by the commotion, so I did some tests. Have you tried this one? If not, or know of a good way that I can blow up some photos for printing and keep as much detail, that would be great help. Just the iPhone remark, makes me wonder how legit this software is. They mention " iPhone photos that look like they came out of a DSLR." and talk about how this software adds detail back into your photos. ![]() ![]() However where they lose me a little is talking about blowing up cell phone photos. They claim you can blow up photos upwards of 600%! And maintain detail. ![]() Or, it could work really well, however they know people might just want it for one photo. Which could be a sign that it doesn't work. They have a trial for everything else, but not this software. I've searched their site and didn't find a trial for this. He was upfront with me and let me know that he had only heard of this software, however had not bought it. I had been asking about blowing up an image and how to maximize sharpness. Another photographer recommended this Gigapixel software from Topaz to me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |